Showing posts with label writing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label writing. Show all posts

Sunday, August 12, 2007

Meet Darren Devitt, Creator of PageFour

I am a word processor junkie. I don't know why. I've downloaded and tried just about every free word processor that you can find with a good Google search. I have a copy of Open Office which, much to my disappointment, is just as bulky and intimidating as MS Word. I think at one time I had as many as eight different word processors on my hard drive, not including MS Notepad or MS Write. All of them had features that I liked, none of them worked precisely the way that I wanted them to.

I found Darren Devitt's PageFour during one of my aforementioned Google searches, shortly after The Great Laptop Crash of 2006. I was using an early 90's DOS word processor called EasyWrite, written by John Turnbull--and happily so--but, for whatever reason, it would not load or operate on my new computer. I wasn't about to use Word (see my many other rants on that topic), so I needed to find a word processor that was simple, useful, and not loaded down with a bunch of features that I would never need or use.

Someone at the Absolute Write message board pointed me to PageFour, and I downloaded the "trial" program. I think the thing that impressed me initially about Darren Devitt, the creator of PageFour, was that--at least at that time--he gave you a fully functional, fully loaded copy of the word processor for free, without annoying pop-ups reminding you to pay for a fully registered version, or features that stop working after a certain amount of time. The "catch," if it could be called that, was that you could only create a limited number of "notebooks." I'm always inclined to do business with people who do good business, and I was immediately in love with the PageFour interface, so after a bit of waffling back and forth about the issue, I sent the man his $30 and got my registration key. I haven't looked back since.

For me, it is a matter of finding a writing environment where I can work creatively. PageFour allows me to set things up the way that I want. I don't have to conform to the word processor, the word processor conforms to me. That is huge. I still move over to Word when it is time to wrestle a manuscript into its final, submission-ready format. Word works for that sort of thing. But I can't write in Word. Since I moved to PageFour, my creative output has risen, and frankly, I enjoy the writing process again.

Naturally curious as I am, I wanted to learn a little more about the man who created this word processor. He very graciously agreed to answer a few interview questions via email.

1. Tell us a little bit about you. How did you get involved in software development? Is it what you always wanted to do? What sort of training and education have you in the field?


I've actually had no formal training in software development, and this very lack of training has benefited me down the years. It's far easier to sit in a meeting with a team of software developers and ask 'why?', when you don't have 4 years of university training telling you the question has already been answered.

I studied history at university, and moved into software development about 8 years ago. I'm honest enough to admit that my reasons were pretty much financial - a long stint backpacking after university left me 26 years old, and with no career. Programming was a lucrative field where you could move from a small to a comparatively large salary very quickly, and this was a great attraction.

What little training I did receive was very much 'on the job'. I've workedfor a number of small software companies in the UK. Each company was small enough that I was involved in critical projects, and experienced little of the corporate life style common in much larger companies.

Having said all that, I enjoy designing software very much, and what started out as a quest for a well paying job has turned into a career I've grown to love.

2. Why did you create PageFour? What was it about all the other word processors available that frustrated you to the point that you felt the need to sit down and begin mapping out a new one?

I began working on an early version of PageFour about a year before version 1 was completed. My feeling at the time was that much of the software used by 'normal' users - and by normal, I mean non-technical people, not in the IT industry - was far too complex, and required an understanding of computers that should not have been necessary. Computer hardware had grown so much over the previous 10 years that old rules and models no longer applied when it came to software development, but the software industry as a whole failed to act on this. I found the Windows file system in particular to have little relevance to normal users. In order to use everyday software such as MS Word effectively, the user needed to understand what files were, what saving a file meant, how the Operating System stored those files, and so much more. And I could come up with no reason why this was necessary.

I built the PageFour 'Notebook, Folder, and Page' structure to hide all this from the user. My intention was to present the user with 'files', and an entire file/folder structure without them ever realising that that was what they were looking at.

My Luddite brother uses PageFour for note taking as part of his business, and he still doesn't know what a file is.

3. What was the first word processor that you ever wrote with? Do you have any fond favorites among the word processors available from, say, the mid '80s to the mid '90s?

I was a student in the early 90s, and at the time was as technically illiterate as the next man. My writing technology of choice was a Panasonic electronic typewriter that boasted a single line LCD display. I wrote my final dissertation on this machine, and was far more careful with my typing and spelling than I am today. If anything, word processors have spoiled us a little, making it so much easier to correct and change our work. Not that I ever complain.

4. Part--perhaps most--of PageFour's "charm," is it's simplicity, and its "writer-friendly" interface. Can you expand your market-base for this product without loading the program down with "bells and whistles?" Is there a point at which you stop tweaking, and that's it?

Now that's a very interesting question. I regularly receive emails from people saying PageFour would be just right for them if only it had one or two more features. The problem is, for each of these people, the one or two features they want are different, and satisfying them all would turn PageFour into just another bloated word processor. There will come a point when I'll stop adding new features, but I believe that's some time away yet. For example, the last major release introduced two 'large' features - a global search, and a page merger - that probably added value for most users. The difficulty is in choosing which new features to add.

I'm firmly of the opinion that attempting to move beyond the 'niche' market of creative writers would damage the product as a whole, so have no intention of adding features simply to broaden its appeal.

5 After PageFour, what's next for Darren Devitt, writing-wise and software-wise?

I have a number of software projects on the go at the moment, none of them in the creative writing field. I'm working on polishing off some small applications that I designed for my own use over the years, with the aim of making them either commercially viable, or at the very least, usable freeware. In terms of paying the mortgage, I'm busy working on an application targeting eBay sellers. Over the past year, I've helped out with the techie side of my brother's eBay business, and noticed some serious deficiencies in the software currently available.

And of course, PageFour is still under development. The user base is growing significantly larger each month, as word of mouth plays its part, and I've become a little more aware of the marketing and selling side of the business.

If you would like to learn more about PageFour, maybe even take it for a test drive, check it out here. And thank you to Darren for taking the time to stop by and tell us a little bit about himself, and the PageFour word processor.

Friday, July 6, 2007

Christine Norris: Return To Zandria


Ivy Peterson was not ordinary. Ivy was More-Than-Ordinary because once she found herself in a very special place and had a very special adventure.

But Ivy was far too old for fairy tales...wasn’t she?

It has been three years since Ivy recovered the Talisman of Zandria, and her life is very different. She is no longer the shy young girl who chased a fairy through a magic gate, but a teenager, concerned with clothes, friends and school. She has nearly forgotten about the special world that exists on the other side of a thin magical veil.

But they have not forgotten her.

Now a crisis is brewing in Zandria, and only Ivy can help. They implore her to come to their aid, and Ivy’s memories of adventure pull her once again into the enchanted world of mermaids, dragons and wizards. Reunited with old friends, and bringing a new one along for the ride, Ivy must now lead them into the wilds of her own world, and not only keep them safe but stop an empire from falling into the clutches of evil.
---Story summary of Return to Zandria, courtesy www.christine-norris.com

Author Christine Norris has been kind enough to let me interview her regarding her writing, and her soon to be released YA novel, Return to Zandria. Christine is a New Jersey native, and a graduate of Temple University. She began writing in 2001, and completed work on her successful first novel, The Talisman of Zandria, in 2004.

In an email interview, Christine answered a few questions about herself, her writing, and her latest novel.

What made you decide to write children's books?
---That's an interesting story. I've always liked fairy tales, and great adventures full of magic and fantasy. But it wasn't until after I read Harry Potter that I decided I wanted to try and write a children's book. I loved the stories, of course, like everyone else, but it was JK Rowling's personal story that inspired me. I thought if she could write a book and sell it, without any formal writing training, then I could too.

Tell us a little bit about Return to Zandria.
---This book picks up three years after the previous one, TALISMAN OF ZANDRIA. Ivy Peterson, who's the heroine, is now fourteen, and a pretty normal teenager. Which, if you read the first book, you know that's not how she always was. Anyway, she's worried about normal teenage things, like school and clothes. She's completely forgotten about her adventure in Zandria. They haven't forgotten about her, though, and they need her now more than ever, because there's a major crisis that only she can help them with. I don't want to give too much away, but it's all very exciting and full of adventure and twists and turns.


Is Return to Zandria written more toward a young female audience? Is there anything in the story that might appeal to boys?
---Maybe. I think more girls will relate to Ivy, but I've seen boys reading the first book, and had several boys tell me they liked it. I like to write about girl heroines, because I don't know how many relate-able female main characters there are in this age group. I think boys will like this one too - there's fighting, and dragons, and magic, and adventure. Connor, the wizard apprentice, has a bigger part to play in this book than the last. I think he'll have quite a bit of appeal to boys.


Which was harder to write, the first book, Talisman of Zandria, or its sequel, Return to Zandria?
---This one was much harder. I didn't have a story for the longest time - there was a time when I didn't think I was going to even write a sequel. This one went through quite a bit more revision, I think, than the first. The beginning was especially tough for some reason. It came out much better than even I expected it to.


Will there be a third book in the Zandria series?
---Everyone has asked me that, and the answer is I just don't know. I haven't closed the door on Zandria, but I'm concentrating on other projects right now, like my upcoming series, the first of which will be out next year, and a full-length Wizard Academies story. But the story for Return to Zandria sort of suprised me, so there's always a chance there will be another book.

What are some authors or books that have influenced and/or inspired you?
---I have my list of 'inital' authors - JK Rowling, CS Lewis, JRR Tolkein...LOL. Plus great authors like Tamora Pierce, Roald Dahl, Jane Yolen, and Madeline L'Engle. A Wrinkle in Time was one of my favorite books when I was young. I wore that book out, I need a new copy. One of my new favorite authors is James A. Owen, who's book Here, There Be Dragons, is my new favorite book. I can't wait for the next in that series, he's terrific, seriously inspirational.

Return to Zandria is due to be released in print on July 28, and an e-book version in .pdf format is available now at LBF Books. For more information about Christine Norris, visit her at her website, or on MySpace.

Author photo courtesy www.christine-norris.com copyright 2007 Sarah A. Lukacs

Tuesday, July 3, 2007

TTG Is Dead

I see this blog as getting a lot more "chatty" in the near future. Mostly I'm sick and tired of trying to run it like an "e-zine," but as well, I am beginning to see it as an excellent outlet for "wool-gathering." Or "lint-picking," if you like the sound of that better.

I have taken my writing off of the computer. I've gone back to the basics: a pen and a legal pad. I wasn't even going to turn the computer on this morning, but I was so wildly successful with today's writing that I thought I deserved a little reward. For whatever reason, I find that working on a computer is uninspiring for me. Maybe it is that I can type fast enough that I am more apt to write garbage (and faster!). It seems that when I write longhand, I more carefully consider what I choose to say, and how I choose to say it. And as slow as it is to write longhand, I actually get more done. On the computer I am constantly tempted (and giving in to the temptation) to "click" on something...usually the Internet. If I'm not "Internetting" then I am constantly rearranging crap...files, desktop, so on. It is all an avoidance tactic. With a pen and a legal pad, you write, or you sit there like an idiot with a blank look on your face. Those are your only options.

The Tronovich Ghost is dead. After over a year of effort, I finally had to play Taps for the thing and let it go. Mainly I am just weary of the project. I have no "fire in my belly" for it anymore. Even if the tenth rewrite/revision cleared up all the plot and technical issues (and I'm not at all certain that it would have) I think the story would have failed do to the fact that it has become dull and lifeless somewhere along the line. The first draft had some energy, but was horribly flawed. The latest draft was much more technically sound, but had no energy whatsoever. Still, TTG remains the first novel-length work of fiction that I have ever completed, and I am proud of the effort that I put into, if not the results. It has been a valuable learning experience, so the time was not wasted.

On to better things...I am beginning preproduction work on a (I think) rather unique fantasy novel. Probably an urban fantasy, but with a nifty little twist that I "thunk" up. Can't spill the beans on that just yet, but I am excited about writing again.

It's been awhile since I could say that.

Friday, June 29, 2007

This is a test

This blog is currently SCREWED UP. I changed the template without first backing up the old one, and now the "Read more..." links do not work. I apologize for the inconvenience. Technicians are busily working to resolve the problem, even as you read this...

This is a continuation of the test. All of this will be deleted later.

Or not. I guess I'll just make this an actual post...and a lesson. I was perfectly happy with the way Vacuum Genesis worked...it was the butt-fugly look that I had come up with that I wanted to change. So I started goofing around with it and the next thing you know I had changed the template. Looks great (or at least better), but suddenly all my crap didn't work. All of my posts were of the "expandable" variety, so that you could read the teaser and then click on "Read More!" to see the entire post. Alas, clicking on "Read More!" did nothing. I clicked and clicked and clicked, but there was no "more!" for me to "read."

I dicked the VG Blogrolls section all to hell as well, but I was able to fix that. Luckily, there was no content lost; just I have to go back through every post and delete some html crap that makes it so you can't see the full post. The lesson? Back up your crap before you do ANYTHING. it is so easy to click on a thing and suddenly realize, OHHHHH NOOOOOOOO!!!!!!

Now then, to make this an OFFICIAL post, rather than me just spilling my guts about my obvious lack of blogging skills...I HAVE AN ANNOUNCEMENT. Vacuum Genesis will be one of several stops on author Christine Norris' "Virtual Book Tour." She'll be here next Friday (July 6th), discussing her new book Return to Zandria, which is a sequel to Talisman of Zandria. You do not want to miss this interview.

(Now you know why I was trying to spruce the place up).

Tuesday, June 12, 2007

It's Up!!!

Okay, not the biggest thing happening in the world right now, I will be the first to admit. BUT, my short-short (I'm old..."flash fiction" for the rest of you) "Transience" is up at Nocturnal Ooze. Check it out!

Sunday, May 20, 2007

Query Tracker

Patrick McDonald has put together a nifty website, the purpose of which is to provide "A Free service which allows authors to find agents and track the status of their query submissions." If enough people participate, this could be a very handy tool. Here's the link Query Tracker and I've put it in the "Of Interest" link list as well. Check it out.

Sunday, April 15, 2007

PageFour Revisited

A few months back I wrote a piece about a word processor--PageFour--the trial version of which I was exploring. I mentioned at the time that I liked the design, but that I wasn't sure whether or not I could depend on the developer enough to turn loose of the thirty bucks he wanted for the full version. Well, shortly after I wrote that article, I got a wild hair and coughed up the dough.

I used PageFour off and on for about a month after I unlocked it, and at first I have to admit that I was a little reluctant to commit myself to it. I have been living in the MS Word mindset for so long that, as much as I despise working with that word processor, I am a little distrustful of anything else. But the longer I worked with PageFour and explored it, the more comfortable I became. Now I use it exclusively, with the exception that I still move my rough drafts over to Word and edit them into final copy there.

PageFour is designed for writers, plain and simple. It strips away all of the business-related junk that you have to work around in Word, and it organizes writing projects in a way that is more accessible and easier to navigate. At the top of PageFour's organizational structure is the "Notebook." A notebook can consist of anything from a single document to a mega-file containing every novel that you have ever written, all neatly tucked into their own folders. The documents that you write and store in your notebooks are called "Pages." The term is slightly misleading in that it doesn't refer to the length of the document. A page can be anything from a grocery list to the entire text of a novel. I prefer to create a notebook called "My Novels." Within this notebook I create separate files for each of my novels. Within those folders I place the various chapters of the novel, usually with several pages for notes on pre-production, characters, setting, outline, and a project scrapbook which I like to have up when I am working on the story itself so that I can quickly jot notes as I go along. Different notebooks can be organized in a way that suits the purpose of the notebook. My "Misc." notebook, for example, contains no folders or sub-folders, only pages. Everything is fully customizable and easy to access via the two panels on the left side of the screen which display all the notebooks on top, and the contents of the currently open notebook below.

Some of the features take a bit of getting used to. PageFour automatically saves your work ever few minutes, and when you close a page. This is handy, although there is one minor bug in that if you are not working in the notebook that you intend to keep the page in when you begin a new page, it will automatically save to whatever notebook that you happen to have open. It is easy enough to move it to the proper notebook, and subsequent saves will go to the proper location. The "Archive" feature looks useful, but I haven't the faintest idea how it works. I skirt the issue by creating a "pagefour backup" file in My Documents and simply remembering to use the "save as files" option to copy an .rtf version of my documents. PageFour's "print template" feature confused me at first, but became my favorite feature once I understood it. Basically, you create a template that defines all the specifications you desire when you print your document (margins, line space, font, etc.) and save it. Having done so, you are free to work in whatever on-screen environment that you choose. Single spaced, Verdana, 18, red will print as double spaced, Courier New, 12, black, if that is what you specified in the template. As an added feature, when you print, the program asks you if you want to use the template (or some other template), or simply print "as is."

I'm certainly not going to write a technical manual for the thing. PageFour has all of the major features that you would expect from a word processor. It has a nice spell-checker that you can set to check while you work, or turn off and check the entire document when you are finished. You can run word-count on an entire document, or some highlighted portion thereof.

If there is anything that I truly dislike about PageFour, then it would have to be the convoluted header/footer/page numbering system. There is no "page break" function in PageFour, so in order to format, say, a novel for final copy printing, you will have to have all your chapters each in their own page. That done, I had to actually email the developer to ask how in the hell you get the program to number pages consecutively across the multiple "pages" without having to manually go in and change the "starting page number" for each document. He emailed me back, apparently there is a way to do it. but I don't have the patience to try and figure it out. It is easier for me to use PageFour as a "rough draft" environment, and simply export the document to Word for final editing, formatting, and printing. I hesitate to say that this is a flaw in the program. It could be that I am just too computer-stupid and lazy to figure it out. But I think that this part of the program could use a little work. It is far from "intuitive."

Bottom line: PageFour is worth the $30. I enjoy writing on this word processor, and whatever minor shortcomings that it may (or may not) have are far outweighed by the sheer joy of spending my writing time actually writing, rather than fighting with the damn word processor.

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Another TTG Rewrite Update

The rewrite is going remarkably well. It's going faster than I had expected, which is nice. It turns out that there are some large chunks of the fourth draft that transfer right on over. Switching to one character POV, third limited, has turned out to be precisely what this story needed.

As I did during the first major revision, I find myself fleshing out the plot-lines more. It turns out (and I learned this from my beta reader) that the parts of the story that I had been treating as sub-plot are actually the most riveting part of the story. My original plot is slowly working its way into the background and the stories of my characters are beginning to creep forward. I'm fine with that. On the downside, it is pretty obvious to me that the further into this rewrite that I get, the more actual writing I will have to do. At the moment I am probably cutting and pasting as much as I am adding to the story. I'm hoping to expand the book to about 60,000 words. I found out that when I line-edit, I cut. And cut and cut and cut. This thing needs to be above 50k when the dust settles.

More later.

Monday, March 19, 2007

Shades Of Gray

I'm not an environmentalist by any stretch of the imagination. That said, I'm not particularly fond of wastefulness either, and I've always felt that taking care of the environment and wisely using its resources are matters of responsible living, rather than a political ideology.

I have never been comfortable with the admonition of my fellow writers that I must edit from printed copy. I understand the reasoning behind it, of course. There are certain things that I simply will not see when I am staring at page after page of text displayed upon a computer monitor. My first idea was to print my rough draft single-spaced in two columns, using a font other than the one that I normally work in (courier new, 12). This cuts the manuscript length in half, and it has the added advantage of forcing my mind to see the words rather than the story that they are telling.

That worked. Then I came up with the idea of using the backs of these printed pages for future rough draft edits. This works too, and I intend to save all paper that has only been printed on one side specifically for this purpose. You would be surprised at how much 8.5 X 11 paper with only one printed side winds up in your house. I get it from my son's teacher, flyers left under the windshield of my car, all sorts of places. Of course, the paper needs to be in relatively good condition (not folded) or it will jam in the printer. But it works.

Still, I wasn't really saving paper so much as I was just better making use of it. Some might say that I was saving the paper that I would have wasted had I not printed on the backsides of the pages that I had already wasted, but I think that is a straw argument. The point is to not waste any paper at all. My completed, pristine manuscript all neatly printed out and sitting on an editor's desk is not a waste of paper (to me, at least, the editor's opinion may differ from mine). Printing my novel out when I know that I am eventually going to send it all through the shredder is a waste of paper, and I don't like it.

Enter my newest idea. I suppose other people do this; I have no reason to suspect that I invented it. I copy and paste my novel into separate chapter files, mostly because it seems a little easier to work with them in smaller portions. Then I use that nifty little "highlighter" feature in Word (yes, it is the first thing about Word that I can honestly say I like) and highlight the entire chapter in 25% gray. Working my way down the chapter, I un-highlight each sentence--one sentence at a time--so that it goes back to the original white. When I have checked that sentence for all of the stuff that needs checking and made any changes that need making, then I highlight it in 50% gray and move on to the next sentence. The whole point is to isolate each sentence (you could work in larger chunks, I suppose) from the rest of the text, and the two shades of gray help keep my eyes and mind from wandering up and down the screen reading the story instead of looking at the words themselves.

It should be noted that this sort of intense line-edit can only be done after I am finished (or at least think I am finished) with the story editing. I don't need a print-out to story edit, and with this nifty new (new to me, anyway) method, I think I can work my way to final draft with no paper wasted on line-editing.

And of course, that means there should be plenty of paper left to print my books on when the editors do finally recognize my artistic brilliance. Or, lacking that artistic brilliance, at least no one can blame me if we run out of paper or we all start choking to death on carbon dioxide. It's all good.

Sunday, March 18, 2007

Absolute Write

I've been a member of this writer's message board community for a couple of months now, and it seems worth mentioning here on the blog. The Absolute Write Water Cooler is a privately owned message board community of writers at various stages in their careers, from aspiring to professional. Membership is free, but you do have to register if you wish to post in the forums. I highly recommend this site, albeit with a few reservations that are discussed below.

AWWC's primary value is in the sheer magnitude of useful information that it contains. If you are a beginning writer you would be well served to make full use of the site's "search" feature, and as far as I know this site can be searched regardless of whether or not you choose to become a member of the community. Virtually any question that you may have concerning writing has already been asked (usually several times), and as near as I can tell the people who come forward to provide answers are quite intelligent, accurate, and helpful.

Of special interest are the "Writing Poetry," "Share Your Work," and "Mentors & Writing Partners" forums. In these areas, you can post your work (or portions thereof) for critique, and find people willing to "beta" read your manuscript. The critique forums are password protected so as to avoid any widespread Internet exposure that some editors might consider a "first rights" problem, but it should be noted that there are conflicting views on this subject--particularly among e-publishers.

Outside of these areas, there are a wide variety of forums covering an even wider variety of topics. No matter what you write, you are bound to find a forum or a sub-forum devoted to it.

On the downside, AWWC suffers from all of the same sorts of problems that you will encounter in any other online community. The problem is perhaps magnified here to a certain extent in that AWWC has such a large active membership of highly creative--and highly opinionated--people. A substantial portion of AWWC is set aside for the discussion of non-writing topics. One non-writing forum, "Take It Outside," is set aside for the express purpose of allowing debate on topics unrelated to writing. The forum description says: "Sometimes we all need a spot to let off steam. Here's the place for controversial subjects, debates, and arguments--but please remember that even here, the rule is "respect your fellow writer." This is in addition to another forum set aside for "Politics & Current Events."

Predictably, these "off topic" forums become the focus of a lot of controversy, conflict, and "board politics," some of which would inevitably spill out into the more useful portions of the community but for the rather heavy-handed (and in some cases seemingly arbitrary) manner in which the board is moderated. You'll note that these particular forums are kept hidden from the casual observer, and are only visible to registered members. I think they would do well to eliminate them entirely. These forums offer nothing that isn't readily available on a multitude of other message boards, and I think they distract from AWWC's main purpose. AWWC is no worse than any other message board in this regard, but--at least as it concerns these issues--they certainly aren't any better either.

By all means make use of this resource, but proceed with caution. Unless you have nothing better to do with your time than spar with keenly articulate and sometimes passionately vindictive people, I would recommend that you avoid the non-writing forums entirely. It is time that would probably be better spent availing yourself of the vast treasure-trove of writing knowledge that this board has amassed.

Wednesday, March 14, 2007

I. Write On

It is becoming obvious to me (through beta readers, and various other critiques) that I tried to slam the trunk lid on TTG way too soon. It is understandable I suppose. When you finish a story, there is an almost overwhelming desire to get it out on the market. You did all that work! You sweated blood! You cried a few tears! You sweated tears and cried blood!

But as I am learning, finishing the first rough draft is really only the beginning of a much more complicated process--the process of editing the manuscript into some form that might actually convince an editor to take it on, and a reader to read it.

As I see it, there are three main stages to writing a book. First is the creation stage. This is the stage in which the writer comes up with the idea, the characters, the setting, and the various conflicts that will propel the story forward toward some climactic conclusion. I see now that I have all my life put an undue amount of importance on this initial phase. I've always felt that once I had a rough draft complete I was essentially done, except for a spell checking and removing a few extra commas here and there. Nothing could be farther from the truth.

The second stage, editing, is in fact the most important part of the process. And not in the least bit fun, I might add. It occurs in two sub-stages (for me, at least): story editing, and line editing. In the story edit, I go through and strengthen all of the major story elements: plot, characterization, setting, and so forth. I go through and cut scenes that don't work, or that don't add anything to the story. I revise scenes that need to be there but are poorly written, or are written from the wrong pov, or that lack certain elements that later scenes will require (foreshadowing, clues, hints, misdirection). And finally, I have to add scenes that are needed to make the ending work, because the way a story actually ends is seldom (if ever) the way that I thought it would end while I was writing the first draft. With all of the major story elements in place, at least to my satisfaction (and with the understanding that one comment from a beta reader could easily cause me to have to go back and completely rewrite the whole blasted thing), I move on to the line edit. This is a brutal process of going through the manuscript sentence by sentence and checking it for proper spelling, grammar, and punctuation. As well, I have to make sure that the sentence hasn't been written in a passive voice, that I haven't made any "commonly confused with" errors (its/it's, their/there/they're, and so on), and a second pov check to make sure that I'm not head-hopping. Only when the manuscript has been edited in this manner can I save it to a file and call it complete.

The third stage is the point at which I craft a query letter and synopsis. This is arguably the most important stage because however brilliant the edited manuscript may be; an editor will never see it (or portions thereof) if he or she is not first swayed by the query and/or synopsis. And I write several synopses; one page, two pages, and five pages, to cover a wider variety of submission situations. All of this goes into the file with the manuscript.

I suppose submitting the materials for editorial review would comprise a fourth stage, but that seems obvious enough. It's largely a matter of researching the intended publisher, making the required trips to the post office, and keeping accurate records of where everything is.

With all of this in mind, I return to the subject of my YA novel. I have considered this project complete several times, only to find myself returning to it because I had skimped during the editing stage. This is particularly frustrating for me as I am a rather linear person. I like to begin a project, work hard on it until it is complete, and then pack it all neatly away and "turn it in." I am nearly a third of the way into my next novel, in the rough draft stage, and I have been very frustrated at the frequent interruptions from my previous novel. As well, it has occurred to me that I will have to write and publish short stories in order to give myself some sort of track record to present to a prospective agent or publisher. The workload (and the confusion) has become overwhelming. The quality of all my work suffers when I try to work in this scatterbrained manner.

The result is that I have had to shelve everything except TTG. I am not going to take one step forward until I have satisfied myself that I have completed all three stages (specifically the editing stage) of this novel. Obviously, an editor or an agent could request further revisions, but that is part of a different process. To get there, I have to have a point at which I can snap the briefcase closed and call it done. Without that feeling of doneness, I can't possible move on to the next project.

Sunday, March 4, 2007

Bogged Down In Beta

Let me start off by saying that "beta" reading is--bar none--the most useful tool for hammering a manuscript into some sort of shape that an editor might be willing to work with. With that firmly established, let me go on to say that it is one of the most frustrating processes that I have ever had to endure.

For those not up on their current "writer buzzwords," beta reading is nothing more complicated than offering what you believe to be the final version of your manuscript (after editing and revision) to someone else so that they can read it and suggest changes, or point out elements that don't work as well as you had hoped. Usually this "beta" reader is a fellow writer, not always. At the very least, he or she should be someone whose opinion you trust, and who can read your work objectively.

I was through three revisions of my YA paranormal novel, The Tronovich Ghost, before I began looking for a beta reader. I was very fortunate to find a fellow in the same position with a YA science fiction novel that he wanted to beta, so we exchanged some personal information, got to know each other a little better, set some goals (i.e., told each other what we expected out of the process, and mentioned particular areas of our work that we wished to have reviewed), and began trading chapters. So far, the experience has been nothing but positive. The guy that I'm working with doesn't pull any punches, or try to blow sunshine up my kilt, but he isn't needlessly heavy-handed in his critique either. This isn't always the case when a writer offers their work up for critique. As I said, I'm very fortunate to have met this guy when I did.

But it's a grueling process. By now, I am already querying agents, and I have outlined and begun work on a new novel. I want TTG DONE. Finished. At least done up to the point that an editor or an agent is asking for revisions. Unfortunately, it is beginning to look like I am going to have to put everything else on hold again, and begin yet a fourth revision of this manuscript. The plot issues are minor-fixes, which is encouraging, but it's the mechanics of the manuscript--the nuts and bolts of it--that are going to require a fairly massive rewrite. POV (I have this disembodied "fourth eye" floating around in the story, popping in for a peek whenever I am trying to skirt a main character perspective that might reveal too much of the plot too soon) and reader confusion in some of my scene transitions seem to be the main culprits this time around.

I know that the story will be better for having gone through this process. I know that every time I go through and revise it, I give myself just that much more of a chance that I might actually sell the damn thing. But I would be lying if I told you that I'm looking forward to it. I'm not. I'm off on a terrifying journey with a 16-year-old girl who is being stalked and terrorized by ... by who? I don't know. And I won't know for a while longer because I'm stuck in some rural Oklahoma town with these other three kids and their g.d. ghost hunters club solving the same g.d. mystery over and over and over again.

Message Board For Writers

I have the world's worst luck with message boards. I don't know why. I think part of it is that I don't speak message board-ese very well, which invariably leads to misunderstandings. More than that, though, I simply cannot tolerate the clique system that seems to dominate those forums.

It goes beyond just being a newbie. Most established boards have one or more cliques, and if you don't readily inculcate yourself into one of them, you are held in suspicious regard. The very act of refusing to participate in the message board clique system is seen as an act of defiance, and brands you as a potential troublemaker. This is made even worse when the administrator of the board actively participates in such nonsense. You can't possibly hope to be treated fairly under such circumstances.

The problem is that message boards--particularly when they serve a specific purpose--can be very useful tools. A writer's message board, just to pick an example totally and completely out of unpremeditated air, can be an excellent resource for critique, market information, how-to, and even emotional support. Where these forums fail, I think, is when the people running them permit--or, God forbid, actually promote--a system in which some people are "in," while others languish about on the outside. It creates an atmosphere that is detrimental to the purpose of the board (unless, of course, the purpose of the board is to prop up the egos of those people fortunate enough to be "in") and ultimately leads to a lot of unnecessary conflict. The final nail in this particular coffin is when a board administrator allows the forum to wander too far from its intended goal. I'm not a big fan of "general discussion" or "political debate" anyway, and I certainly don't care to see it on a message board that is ostensibly about something else entirely.


So, against my own better judgement, I found a service that let me create my own message board for writers. Click on APOCRYPHA INK over in the links for writers section. I don't know if it will work or not, but I like the idea well enough to spend a little of my time on it. It's not costing me anything, and I am an eternal optimist. If you are a writer, looking to help launch a community such as the one that I have described, check it out. If it works, it will be cool as hell. If it doesn't work, well, it still looks cool as hell.

Friday, January 26, 2007

How NOT To Market Your "Niche" Software

In my constant, ongoing, never-ending, all-consuming quest for a word processor that doesn't make me want to commit violent crimes, I ran across a program called PageFour. Let me start off by saying that PageFour is an excellent product. This isn't a product review, so I will provide a link below for people who want to look into it further.

PageFour is the creation of an independant software developer in the UK, operating under the name imbt Software. It is intended as an alternative to the more business-oriented word processors, such as MS Word, and it is geared primarily toward people who write creatively. To this end, I think PageFour is an overwhelming success. The product does what I want it to do, the way I want it done, and it lets me turn crap on, rather than having to figure out how to turn it all off.

The software is available for download online. Essentially, you download a trial version of the software that allows you to test-drive all of it's features, but limits the number of files ("notebooks" and "pages," in PageFour parlance) that you can create. If you decide to use the product, then you can pay for a license that will fully activate the product on your system. At about $30, the price is very attractive and commensurate to the product offered, and the entire trial-and-purchase process seems very straight forward, and well thought-out.

But I don't think that I will be purchasing a license to use this product, and out of fairness to the developer I will have to delete the trial version of PageFour from my computer. The problem has nothing to do with the product, which is excellent, as I've already said. The problem is the manner in which the developer has chosen to present his word processor. I am at best a reluctant online shopper. This is due largely to my innate distrust of the Internet, and my reticence to provide personal information -- particularly bank or credit card information -- to anyone online, however legitimate they may be. The result is that I tend to scrutinize an online business much more carefully than I might were I purchasing something at a "brick and mortar" store.

To this end, I began to investigate the developer. I searched the product on the Absolute Write message board, where I had first heard of it. There wasn't a great deal of buzz about it, for a board of that size, but what references I could find were generally positive. I saw that the developer himself had joined the group and, in the appropriate forum, had attempted to promote his product. I also noticed that he had joined the forum in December of 2005, and that he had only made nine posts in all of that time, the latest being in March of 2006. For some reason that set off some alarm bells for me, particularly the date of the last post, or more specifically, the lack of further posts after that date. What was going on?

Curious, I went to the developer's blog. The latest post on that blog was dated October, 2006. Again I was struck by the date. Why the three-plus months of silence? Further down in the blog I came across an article by the developer entitled "Things I did Wrong--PageFour Deconstructed." In it, the developer outlines what he believes to be the main reasons that his product is not more commercially successful. That was all it took. My confidence level plummeted, and I decided not to pursue the issue any further.

Given that PageFour is clearly an excellent and useful product, I think the lesson is this: Even if you are a small, or independent software developer, don't act like one. Maintain a visible and professional presence. If you are going to have a blog in support of your product, update it regularly. It was quite evident to me, simply by checking the dates of the blog posts, that the blog was created about the same time the product was made available, and that both have slowly faded into silence as the product sales failed to meet the developer's expectations. Don't discuss your marketing failures, or, if you must, at least don't discuss them on the same forum that you use to promote the product you are having difficulty marketing. It's rather off-putting, and in at least one case (my own) resulted in a "thanks-but-no-thanks." It would be far better to remain silent on the issue, move on to your next (presumably more successful) project, and let the quality of the former product speak for itself.

I hope the best for imbt Software. If PageFour is any indication, I believe that this developer will offer many exciting and useful programs in the future. Until then, I hope that he (she, they) take a serious look at their marketing strategy, and use such tools as they have better to their advantage. In the meantime, my quest for the perfect word processor goes on.

And on...and on...and on...

You can check out PageFour, and the related imbt blog here, and here.

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

Word (Again)

What is it about MS Word that makes me want to drown kittens? I don't know why in God's great name I can't get this word processor to work for me. I've discussed it with some of the folks over at the Absolute Write message board, and most of them agree that I must be some sort of moron.

It doesn't matter what automatic thing I track down and shut off, there is always something else Word wants to do for me that I don't want done. Our latest conflict is over the TAB feature. I have everything set up such that, when I open Word, I am presented with a blank document set up with all the format specifications that I want. I turned off every auto whatsit that I could find. I even learned how (and where) to rid myself of that annoying "Widow/Orphan" control thing. And yet, invariably, somewhere along the line, Word decides to start tabbing for me every time I hit the "enter" key at the end of a paragraph. Since I am used to doing this myself, I wind up with two tabs, and the first sentence of the paragraph is five extra spaces too far right. There is a little marker in the ruler at the top of the screen, and when I drag it back to where it should be, the line of text moves flush to the left margin. Go back down to tab that line back over, and the damn marker resets again. Somebody at AW suggested that I ctrl-a to highlight the entire document, then move the stupid tab marker back where I want it. Problem is, when I hit ctrl-a and highlight the document, the stinking ruler disappears completely, taking that annoying marker with it.

My current project involves a lot of cutting from one file and pasting into another, along with the addition of new material. Half of my quotation marks are "smart quotes," the other half are all "straight quotes," and the two mix and mingle like guests at a friggen Star Trek convention. I've tried various free word processors that you can download online. Most of them suck, and the rest simply don't work. It's an exercise in futility, at any rate, because everything has to be brought back over into Word before I can submit it anyway.

I've begun to notice a certain smugness among experienced Word users. There seems to be this underlying assumption that, if I'm a real writer, then it is my job to know how to operate MS Word. I think that's a load of crap. I think that the publishing industry ought to have as it's standard a word processor designed for writers, not for business applications. At the very least, Word should come with a big button labeled "all automatic crap OFF," so that I could just turn on those features that I need, when I need them.

Might save a few kitties.

Saturday, January 20, 2007

The Whipped Dog Returneth

Well, let's see how this works. Just added a hack from hackosphere to get those fancy "peekaboo" posts that seem all the rage. We'll see how that goes. There is also the matter what to do with all the old posts on this blog. If you've been following along, then you know that I had abandoned this blog due to problems with Blogger.

Well, I'm back. My little experiment with "Blue Host" and "Wordpress" didn't go the way that I had planned, and it cost me $100 to boot. It is simply beyond my ability to create and maintain my own website (or blog) and as piss-poor as the customer service is on Blogger, it is marginally better than no customer service whatsoever. The truth is, I simply do not care to learn all that crap. Or, more specifically, I don't care to learn any more than I have to. I don't mind fiddling with the html on Blogger, mostly because I can always save and go back if I absolutely botch it all to hell. Over at the Blue Host site, I was casting about in the wilderness.

Updates: I'm pretty much back to square one with The Tronovich Ghost, my YA novel. The first rough draft came out at just under 30,000 words, which is about 20,000 words short of what that market wants. I'm not the kind of writer who can effectively go back over it and plug new scenes in, or "pad" the ones that I already have. So I am sitting here with a copy of the original manuscript on the desk in front of me, starting over from scratch. It is a quandry, because part of me (most of me, actually) wants to just chuck the thing and move on to something else. But the bottom line is that I've already put too much time and effort into this story, and it is getting better during the rewrite process. So here I still am. I guess the pirate-girl is just going to have to hang out in her dressing room for awhile. Maybe she and the "love interest" can practice their sex-scenes.

Mmmmmm...

Thursday, January 18, 2007

An Interview With Elissa Malcohn, Former Editor Of Star*Line

I began writing speculative poetry in high school and saw my work published in various speculative poetry magazines from the mid 80's through the early 90's. The market was surprisingly good for such a small genre. A few small press magazines, such as The Magazine of Speculative Poetry, were devoted entirely to the form.

There were a handful of small press science fiction, fantasy and horror magazines that would publish poetry specific to their genre, and several larger magazines such as Isaac Asimov's Science Fiction Magazine and Amazing Stories were open to science fiction oriented speculative poetry as well. But the premier magazine for speculative poetry in those days was the Science Fiction Poetry Association's (SFPA)official newsletter Star*Line, created by SFPA founder Suzette Haden Elgin in 1977. I recently contacted former Star*Line editor Elissa Malcohn, and she was kind enough to grant me the following interview. Ms. Malcohn was editor at Star*Line from 1986 through 1988, and had been the newsletter's associate editor for a year prior to that. The interview provides an insight into the small, eclectic community of writers who call themselves speculative poets, and we get to meet one of the genre's prime movers.

VG- How did you discover Star*Line, and how did you become editor there?
EM- I discovered the Science Fiction Poetry Association (SFPA) and Star*Line in 1980 at Noreascon II: my first visit to Boston and the first of two Worldcons I attended. At that conference I'd written "Ybba", the first poem I submitted to Star*Line, on the back of the only flyer I could find that wasn't printed on both sides. Speculative poetry was a completely new form for me, though I'd been submitting science fiction prose (short stories and my first, unpublished, novel) since the mid-70s. I was also submitting poetry to mainstream publications.

Robert Frazier edited Star*Line then. When he accepted "Ybba" and invited me to submit more material I jumped at the chance. I'd had a smattering of publications up to that point, but Star*Line was the first to accept my work fairly consistently.

In 1983 I moved from New York to Massachusetts. Bob and his family lived on Nantucket and invited me to visit. I spent several wonderful days with them, during which time Bob showed me the editorial ropes. At that point I became Star*Line's assistant editor, and then became editor about a year later.

VG- What did you enjoy most about editing Star*Line?
EM- Simply connecting with people and being exposed to a variety of visions and styles.

VG- Why did you leave Star*Line?
EM- I was dealing with health problems and family crises, which when combined with work and economic pressures led to my dropping off the face of the earth as far as publications were concerned. I am very thankful to everyone who picked up the reins -- Bob Frazier, Frances Langelier, Bruce Boston, Chuck and Susan Noe Rothman, and others -- and would like to take this opportunity to apologize for all those things I'd inadvertently let slip through the cracks.

VG- When you were at Star*Line, what qualities in a submitted poem made it a "keeper?" What would you say was the most common reason for a poem being rejected?
EM- I tell my students that the whole submissions and editorial process is ultimately subjective. When I rejected a poem I wrote, "Another editor may feel differently." I've been on the other side of that equation as well.

A poem can grab me through its crafting of language and its ideas. How is conventional language used in unconventional ways? How are metaphors used to engage the imagination? Some of the poems I rejected were literal depictions of everyday events, and which I believed did not possess enough wordplay to make the leap into the speculative realm. Some were simply too long for Star*Line's format, though we did sometimes publish long poems. Some, I felt, simply needed much more crafting.

VG- Did you use a computer to put Star*Line together back in those days, or did you have to cut and paste? Describe the process of putting Star*Line together.
EM- For most of my tenure, layout was strictly cut-and-paste, complete with scissors and glue stick along with rub-on lettering. I used White-out to mask paper lines. Before I could get enough art submissions I also created collages by copying, cutting, and pasting clip art taken from old Dover books. I used a computer to generate the text, but in those days I loaded a primitive word-processing program from an eight-inch floppy disk and used a daisy-wheel printer. I then sent camera-ready copy to Bruce Boston, then at Berkeley.

VG- Star*Line is nearing 30 years of publication. Did you think it would go this far? Would you be more likely to say that you like the new Star*Line, or that you miss "the old days"?
EM- I don't think I ever thought in terms of whether Star*Line would or wouldn't last. I was very excited to help educate people about speculative poetry back in the 80s, and I am thrilled to be doing so again in publications like PFM. When I compare new and old issues of Star*Line side by side I see continuity rather than discontinuity. The vocabulary may reflect new technologies and cultural changes, but the poetic underpinnings -- the power and crafting of that vocabulary -- remain the same for me.

VG- Besides Star*Line, there were several other speculative poetry magazines back in the mid 80's. What were some of your favorites?
EM- The Magazine of Speculative Poetry (Roger Dutcher, ed.) and Velocities (Andrew Joron, ed.) -- along with Aurora and Tales of the Unanticipated, small-press magazines that included speculative poetry.

VG- How do you define the term "speculative poetry"? What makes a poem "speculative"? Do you make a distinction between speculative poetry and science fiction poetry?
EM- I consider science fiction poetry to be a subset of speculative poetry -- and would say the same for fantasy, horror, and science poetry. An article of mine, forthcoming in the Winter 2007 issue of Poets' Forum Magazine, introduces the concept of speculative poetry to the general readership. PFM is interactive, introducing poetic forms and concepts and providing its readers with "challenges".

Expanding on the SFPA's definition of speculative poetry as driven by speculation, I wrote, "Such poetry often uses metaphors to engage the imagination and go beyond everyday reality. Even writing about the world around us, but using language other than what one might expect, can create a speculative poem."

For that reason I would place works such as Edgar Allen Poe’s “The Raven” and Diane Ackerman’s volume of astronomical poems, The Planets: A Cosmic Pastoral (William Morrow & Co., 1977) in the speculative poetry category.

VG- Do you think that speculative poetry has achieved the recognition that you and others were striving for back in the mid 80's?
EM- I've been away from the field for more than a decade so I haven't followed the trajectory, but I can point to several instances of recognition. Within the mainstream arena, the National Federation of State Poetry Societies (http://www.nfsps.com/index.htm) has featured at least two speculative categories in its annual contests. The Futuristic Award asks for a poem "that is optimistic, sensitive and persuasive concerning 2057 AD." A past category, the Cecilia Parsons Miller Memorial Award, called for poetry of a fantastic and/or mythological nature.

Within the genre, my info comes from the speculative poetry panel at Necronomicon, which occurred in Tampa at the end of October 2006. ("Necro" was the first science fiction convention I'd attended in almost 20 years. There I met Marge Simon and Bruce Boston in person for the first time. I had corresponded with them while I was editor of Star*Line.) Once used mainly as “filler” in science fiction magazines when it was published at all, speculative poetry now can fill one or more pages, with credit in the table of contents. Such was already happening in the 80s, but that recognition seems to be more prevalent now.

As I am newly discovering, e-zines and blogs disseminate literary work, including speculative poetry, to broad audiences that might not have discovered the form in a hardcopy-only world. Online market lists further increase that exposure.

A guest essay of mine ("Using Metaphor to Terrify") has just been published as part of Marge Simon's [current editor of Star*Line] regular column for the Horror Writers Association, "Blood & Spades: Poets of the Dark Side" (December 2006). In addition to being delighted when Marge solicited my article, I was also happy to see a regular column at the HWA devoted to poetry. Illustrating the broad range of speculative poetry, two of the three poems accompanying the article were recent award-winners in FSPA contests. The third had originally appeared in The Magazine of Speculative Poetry back in 1985.

VG- What other publications have you edited?
EM- I've edited the annual anthology of the Florida State Poets Association (FSPA) since 2005 (I've produced it since 2003) and continue to do so. I also have edited and produced the (non-literary) newsletter of the Art Center of Citrus County since June 2006 and recently chaired the committee that updated its format. Back in the 70s I edited and produced several publications at my undergraduate alma mater, Wagner College: its literary magazine, Nimbus; psychology department newsletter, Hallucinations; and The Note, newletter of its honorary music society Alpha Tau Mu. In 1995 I edited the newsletter of the first Boston-New York AIDS Ride.

VG- You mentioned that you have been away from the field for a while; why was that, and do you have any future plans involving speculative poetry?
EM- I've recently rejoined the SFPA and look forward to getting involved in that organization again. I'm excited at the prospect of bridging speculative and mainstream arenas, both with the article forthcoming in PFM and with a report I wrote on Necronomicon's speculative poetry panel, forthcoming in the FSPA newsletter Of Poets And Poetry.

My "disappearance" began in October 1988 when I left my employer to start my own business, formalizing the freelance work I'd done all along to supplement my day job. Thanks to finally finding the right medication for a physical ailment, I was also living relatively pain-free for the first time in 18 years. Long work hours put a severe damper on my Muse but stretched me in other ways. After two years of fulltime freelance work I again became an employee while continuing my independent business. During this time I also taught science fiction writing at the Cambridge Center for Adult Education and creative writing at the Dorchester Center for Adult Education. In 2003 I again left employment to pursue fulltime freelancing.

I was also exploring new creative and other avenues. In the early 90s I produced a cassette tape of original music after I'd bought a Mac to meet client requirements and realized that I could experiment with MIDI (Musical Instrument Digital Interface). In 1995 I did the first Boston-New York AIDS Ride, thrilled to bicycle from my adopted to my native city. At the end of that year I also began a relationship with my partner, Mary, whom I had met in the "Women Writing" group at the Cambridge Women's Center; we celebrate our 11th anniversary this month (December 2006). We trained for a year before hiking to the floor of the Grand Canyon and back up again in 1998.

I became involved in a local chapter of the international "Goddess 2000" project and began experimenting with mixed-media art. That led to my participation in shows at the Zeitgeist Gallery (Cambridge, MA), Massachusetts College of Art (Boston), A Strong Cup of Coffee (Dorchester, MA), and now the Art Center of Citrus County in central Florida. I also helped organize the first Dorchester Open Studios.

The stresses of 9/11 came very shortly after a cousin with whom I was very close died at age 44. I coped by taking up running, and continued that activity up to the time of my father's death in 2002 (my mother had died 20 years earlier). Mary and I moved to Florida in 2003. Thanks to the Internet I've kept some Boston clients, picked up new ones, and work locally as well, teaching creative writing at the Art Center. (My course and a co-ed, free-writing group that I patterned after "Women Writing" mark the center's first regular activities devoted to creative writing.) In 2005 I purchased my first "good camera" and have exhibited and sold some photographic work. My website (a search for "Malcohn's World" should get you there) lists additional community activities.

Following our move down here I returned to my own creative writing in earnest and have been trying to get back up to speed in the industry. Given that the Internet didn't exist for the general public when I was last active, I feel a bit like Rip Van Winkle.

VG- I understand that you recently signed a contract for a book called Covenant. What can you tell us about Covenant, and when can we look for it?
EM- Covenant, the first volume of my trilogy Deviations, is forthcoming from Koboca Publishing in November 2007. That story has particular relevance for this interview because it was inspired by Joseph Payne Brennan's 15-line poem, "When Tigers Pass" (from his Sixty Selected Poems, The New Establishment Press, 1985). I forget where I bought the Brennan volume, but I'm sure it was within the speculative poetry arena. Although Brennan was known mainly as a horror writer, he had also published seven poetry collections.

I read "When Tigers Pass" while riding the bus home from work in November 1985. By the time I reached my stop I was mentally outlining a short story -- which, though praised by peers, was also criticized as needing more information and explanation. I put the draft away because I was working on other projects at the time. After moving to Florida I dug out the draft and my old critiques and began to expand the story into what became Deviations.

From my pitch: "Long ago the Masari and the Yata hunted together in peace, until the species they drove to extinction included those possessing nutrients necessary to Masari survival. The Yata then became the only source of those nutrients. Deviations tells how these peoples cope with the reality of being sentient creatures forced to play the roles of predator and prey, and how several of them try to thwart long-established conventions in the hope of overcoming their biological imperative. In Deviations love triumphs in the midst of death. The series focuses on the social, ethical, and spiritual dilemmas surrounding both the literal cannibalism of the societies involved and the many ways in which their different communities feed off each other."

Covenant takes its title from the religious system that embodies one method of coping. The conflict that system engenders sets the stage for larger upheavals across the region in a pre-industrial, Earth-like world.

VG- Any chance that you will be editing another speculative poetry magazine in the future?
EM- I imagine I'm fairly out of touch with the genre at this point, and would want to catch up with recent publications. Afterwards -- who knows?

VG- In your entire career to date, writing or editing, what are you most proud of?
EM- I write from my own corner of the human condition in the hope that a reader can relate to what my Muse delivers. I had no inkling of the attention that "Lazuli" (Asimov's, Nov. 1984) would get, but what affected me most was learning that it has helped some readers deal with their own trauma of abuse. I had drafted the story after attending one of Ellen Bass's "I Never Told Anyone" workshops. Part of its text is taken from writing I did as part of that workshop.

I enjoy being a facilitator. Many people want to express themselves but are intimidated by the act of writing. I gear both my teaching and my free-writing group toward overcoming that intimidation. Often people come to the group claiming they "can't write" and then surprise themselves. If they are looking or ready for criticism I direct them to a local critique group in which I am also active, and which has helped me a great deal as well.

If you would like to learn more about Ms. Malcohn and her work you can find her at Malcohn's World and Chronicles From Hurricane Country.